What should a mandated reporter do if they suspect neglect but lack concrete evidence?

A mandated reporter is required to act when they have reasonable suspicion of child neglect or abuse, even if they do not have concrete evidence. The key principle behind this requirement is the protection of children. A report based on a reasonable suspicion allows child protective services to investigate the situation further, ensuring that any potential harm to the child is evaluated and addressed.

This approach emphasizes the idea that child safety is paramount, and the role of a mandated reporter is to trigger an investigation rather than to act as a judge of the situation. By making a report, the mandated reporter helps ensure that trained professionals can assess the situation thoroughly, which may uncover evidence or confirm concerns that the reporter alone could not provide.

In contrast, ignoring the situation disregards the potential risk to the child, while consulting with a colleague or gathering more information may delay necessary action. These actions could compromise the child's safety, demonstrating the importance of acting promptly when there is any cause for concern.